Talk:100 Far Realm Occurrences (3.5e Other)

Ratings
== Edit Notes ==

Placing edit notes here whenever I make semi-major changes to peoples stuff. First up....

Tweaked wording on your entries Spaz. The first, because it had a feedback issue where you'd soon be making an expodentially infinite number of attacks as the battle dragged on. I stopped that by adding a duration and limiting it to blood-letting attacks. And second, because that was just crazy and didn't make much sense. Actually if I was reading it right, for every die in the round, which could range from 1 to lots of rolls, there was 1d4 re-encounters with a creature which probably has nothing to do with the DM's plot. For their sanity I kept the idea, but changed it more into a "you're cursed with a reverent" concept.

That is all. -- Eiji-kun 23:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Might I suggest that you only rolle on this table every 1d12 hours or every time you have shifted more than 3d4 layers, every 1d4 rounds would make a trip to the far
 * realm kill any campaign. Born to Be Wild 06:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Did I put 1d4 rounds? Good god, I think I was thinking this only applies during far realm storms or something.  Since I can't remember the original intent, let's go with what you said. Fix'd.  -- Eiji-kun 06:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

25 to go and we are up and running
Got a few ideas more but have to run for now, but this is soon finished :) Are my ideas along your concept Born to Be Wild 10:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * By and large, I've made edits to a few, but most of its just typo fixing, I try to keep the base concept whenever I need to change the mechanics of it.


 * Not much more now. -- Eiji-kun 10:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Topped it off for ya. Hope you have enjoyed my contributions, but I understand if you don't.--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 16:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Tightened mechanics one one while keeping the same concept, but I couldn't save the other, too complicated. I used the title as inspiration for The Rave though.  Anyway, with that, that's a wrap!  -- Eiji-kun 17:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)