Talk:Expanded Weapon Size Damage (3.5e Variant Rule)

Actually...
When extrapolated, it goes 6 -> 8 -> 12 -> 16 -> 24 -> 32 -> 48 -> 64 --Ghostwheel 08:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I have seen that progression too, but never an offical wording on it. Since the doubling concerns me I figured, what if it just added one?  It works out nicely for my purposes. -- Eiji-kun 08:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * DMG page 28 --Ghostwheel 08:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah but that only goes up to Colossal. -- Eiji-kun 08:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * ...You didn't even look at it, did you? It doesn't say "colossal". It doesn't have any sizes whatsoever. All it shows is the damage progression, and sets a precedent. +1, +1, +2, +2, +4... you can guess the rest. --Ghostwheel 08:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * There, best of both worlds. -- Eiji-kun 09:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Averages
Can you put the averages in parenthesis next to the dice? --Havvy 02:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Sure, why not. :) -- Eiji-kun 04:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)