User talk:MisterSinister/TOToM (3.5e Sourcebook)/SRP3

Auras
Can we get rid of the DC and level (faint, moderate, ect.) for auras for magical items? Maybe just give a school for auras, and call it good, or possibly remove them altogether. --Havvy 08:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I think aura's offer some potentially useful information as effect level benchmarks, but they could certainly be altered. Rather than eliminating them altogether, what if they read relative strength in the aura. So available results might be: much less than you (CL << your CL), less than you (CL < Your CL), about as strong as you (CL = your CL +/- 2), etc. - Tarkisflux 17:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * IMO, the item level of the MIC better portrays that information than the aura DC and level. As such, why not just use that as the aura level if you think we should keep it? --Havvy 19:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm inclined to agree with Havvy here. The idea of item levels is something I actually support, and to be honest, allowing something like detect magic to just straight-up determine the CL or item level (IL, perhaps?) of something is probably better than the current system, which is based on a lot of guesswork. - MisterSinister 20:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I meant item level for items actually, so that's fine. - Tarkisflux 20:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)