Talk:Special Attack (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)

Spelling
It's "iterative", not "irrative". --Ghostwheel 00:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Ha, I didn't even notice the comment. Fixed though, along with several other errors. --Ganteka Future 00:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. And not just for this. You have been a lot of cleaning up around this site, and I want you to know that I appreciate it. Thank you!--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 02:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Clarification
I think this feature needs some clarification, some examples would be really helpfull. By half of the iterative attack bonus you give up, do you mean say a level 11 fighter giving up their +6 attack for raid, they would be able to make a line attack 5 by 15? Originally I thought it meant that that 11th level fighter taking raid would be giving up their +6 and +1 attack to make a 5 by 5 line attack which is quite obviously underpowered. Still, if it's the former bangarang seems absurdly powerful, a 20th level fighter making 8 attacks at full bab without any other attack number modifiers. Also, some clarification on how these abilities interact with other bonus attacks; if they're hasted can they do the special attack twice or is it a standard action? what about flurry of blows and other like abilities?
 * For now I will say that they are full round actions, unless anyone can name a compelling reason for them not to be. As for the power level, that is the point. This alternative class feature is intended by it's nature to make most fighter and monk classes rogue level, and rogue level classes wizard. That is also why primary casters (which I will define as any class with a full nine spell level progression) are forbidden to take it.--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 18:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)