SRD talk:Shades

Readability and RAW
So this page is one of many examples where the actual spell description is "X functions like Y, except Z," but we copied and pasted the relevant material instead, making changes as necessary. And indeed, the changes were made in a way that was accurate to the rules text. But they do rather obscure something which a reader might otherwise see: it's entirely possible that changing only two of those 20%s to 80%s was an oversight. With these changes already made, readers are less capable of interpreting what might have been meant by the rules text. I think we should display the SRD text verbatim, in this case. Thoughts? --DanielDraco 09:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * If you want to rewrite to SRD verbatim, go ahead. We can include the actual updated lookup text (with more 20s replaced by 80s because that looks like an oversight) in a block for clarity, keeping both the verbatim text and the helpful clarity edits. - Tarkisflux Talk  15:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)