User talk:Spazalicious Chaos/World Types- an Examination of D&D Assumptions

A guide
I agree that this could not be a sourcebook. Yet, propose that it would fit well as a guide. --Franken Kesey 00:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * No. That would be the wrong place. Try 3.5e Other. --Aarnott 01:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As it stands, it could not be a sourcebook. But what if expanded on this? It is kind of a synopsis of a sourcebook as it stands, but lacks the mechanical bite for a actual sourcebook. It I can give it that bite, would it work?--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 22:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Type I
Also known as E6... --Aarnott 01:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed, and E6 is better at presenting realistic/histroical worlds than core, which is pretty much the point I was making. However, more than just characters must be changed for such a world to work.--Change=Chaos. Period. SC 22:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)