Talk:Eyefire (3.5e Spell)

Ratings
== Not Sure If Moderate... ==

8d6 damage is almost decent at level 11, and Quickening spells isn't really all that great yet at that level. If you can expect to use this during a pre-combat buff round, it's almost certainly a good addition to a High-balance Cleric's repertoire. --Foxwarrior (talk) 02:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Firing 2 as a standard instead of a swift is probably M though. - Tarkisflux Talk 02:25, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure I agree; a Moderate Wizard can spam scorching rays for 12d6 as a standard at that level. --Foxwarrior (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Since it's blaster wizard vs. healer cleric (that's what we're doing if we're comparing moderate balance stuff IMO) mean that's not a particularly appropriate direct comparison. If that was on the cleric list directly, instead of indirectly via domain, it would probably be a level or two higher than the wizard version because clerics get mediocre or delayed blasting spells. Adding two or three spell levels in exchange for giving it a multi-round duration and eliminating the 30' targeting restriction seems fair as well. Which sets the tally at 1-2 for cleric list and 2-3 for effect changes, and leaves it at about 6th level. Which is right where it is of course, and why I think it would be ok as a standard action moderate spell.


 * That does make it rather clear that the spell could afford to be on the wizard list at a level or two lower and also give you a scaling number of rays. It's not bad at moderate without those things though. - Tarkisflux Talk 03:47, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Its'a good thing everyone loves evoca- wait a sec....
Wait, Transmutation? Not Evocation? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 05:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Because of REASONS. No? Ok, Evocations it is, then. Spanambula (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)