Talk:Lichbound (3.5e Prestige Class)

Ratings
== Why Spend Stuff? ==

If you're taking class levels to get this, I really don't see why you should also have to spend gold and XP. Surgo 16:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * While I see your point, I did not remove the XP/gold requirement on the idea that I was just replacing the LA with a slightly longer class progression (4 lost levels vs 5 class levels). It has always been an odd point... gold, yes, I see that, but the XP makes it LA plus some (and that applies even with the LA 4, which is absurdly overpriced.  It should be LA 2.5, so LA 2 or maybe LA 3).


 * Now, I have been told this class is pretty powerful as is, so it's probably not a good idea to remove the gold/xp, though if I did, I'd at least drop the xp requirements. Any ideas on the matter, both from you and others? -- Eiji Hyrule 03:21, December 10, 2009 (UTC)


 * After looking it over I noticed something was odd, namely someone had changed it to full casting when it was CL -2 originally. After some mibbit chat debate, I decided to make it -1 CL, but remove the xp cost, no need to stunt your leveling growth.  The -1 CL also is better than -2 since it allows more multiclassing options (not all good PrCs give full casting, and you usually don't want to lose more than -2 anyway, otherwise you start to stray from the whole caster thing).  -- Eiji Hyrule 03:43, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Minor Nitpicking
Wouldn't "lichbound" be it's own plural? The additional 's' doesn't quite roll off the tongue, in my personal opinion. ^.^ This is barely worth mentioning, but I figure there's no in harm saying it. -- Techpriest88 23:15, April 7, 2010 (UTC)