Talk:Toxinblade (3.5e Class)

(if any)?
As per the line Toxin Points per round, and may forcibly create more by taking a full-round action to generate a number of Toxin Points equal to his Constitution bonus (if any).

Wouldn't it make sense to change (if any) to (minimum +1), so that anybody may use this and still gain more toxin points? Yes, I know it is rare that a toxinblade will not have a bonus for Con, but it is possible. Keep this a viable move always, please. -Havvy 05:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I put it there to discourage people from doing so at low con. You're not supposed to waste full round actions to get TP if you're at close to +1 Con mod--+2 to +3 I could see, but wasting the whole action for just +1...? I just don't see it. --Ghostwheel 09:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

A Comment
this class is realy overpowerd and should only have d8 dit dice and a poor base attack other that its overpowerment it so totaly rocks


 * Explain thyself or thy words shall be as dust and chaff upon the wind. --Ghostwheel 00:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * With grammar not befitting a five-year-old with an attention disorder, at that. - MisterSinister 00:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Probably, anonymous was oblivious to this wiki's balance point assumptions, and balancing this class against the fighter. --Ideasmith 00:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Better yet, the healer. - TG Cid 03:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * You're all wrong. This guy's balance point is a commoner. - MisterSinister 04:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Insidious Venom Range?
So is anything within line of sight fair game? - Spanambula (talk) 12:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * "All abilities that require the use of Toxin Points have a range of Close (with effective caster level equal to character level) unless noted otherwise in the ability."
 * That said, I really need to give this class a reflavor/reword at some point... --Ghostwheel (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it would be better to explicitly say the range with every ability. --Aarnott (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)