Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ratings)
(Added rating.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun
 +
|rating=oppose
 +
|reason=Am I reading the same feat HB is reading?  I don't see anything about ranged attacks in here, I see a massive attack bonus.  Which is weird, because barbarians need attack bonuses the least: they are the ones with full BAB, high strength, and even higher strength when they rage.  They are "I Hit You: The Class".  Are are you giving them bonuses to hit?
 +
 +
The attack wand thing is nice.  Though ironically nothing about this feat removes the need for UMD, on the barbarian who won't have it as his class skill and probably tanked charisma.  So... suboptimal there, and strangely broken otherwise.
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=HB Forged
 
{{Rating |rater=HB Forged
 
|rating=neutral
 
|rating=neutral

Revision as of 00:23, 27 November 2018

Ratings

RatedOppose.png Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
Am I reading the same feat HB is reading? I don't see anything about ranged attacks in here, I see a massive attack bonus. Which is weird, because barbarians need attack bonuses the least: they are the ones with full BAB, high strength, and even higher strength when they rage. They are "I Hit You: The Class". Are are you giving them bonuses to hit?

The attack wand thing is nice. Though ironically nothing about this feat removes the need for UMD, on the barbarian who won't have it as his class skill and probably tanked charisma. So... suboptimal there, and strangely broken otherwise.

RatedNeutral.png HB Forged is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
I don't see why this feat shouldn't exist. I mean, sure, barbarians are great up close. However, the class NEEDS ranged options, & better access TO such options, not WORSE access. Overall, 2 out of 4. Not high enough to seem like I love it (not that I like it), but high enough to keep it from being blammed.

However, I concur that +6 is a little much. Maybe +4 would be better?

RatedDislike.png Zhenra-Khal dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
Echoing everybody else's rating, +6 is too much. It would be different if it scaled (Like +1 per 3 or 4 levels in a Rage-granting class), but you can literally take this at 1st level and get a free +6 to hit. Other than the large bonus, I don't dislike the feat at all. It's just... Broken, in that one bit.
RatedOppose.png Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
The name sounded cool, but it just a ridiculous number boost.
RatedDislike.png ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
I have to agree with UK and GW here, especially given that the Barbarian already has a bonus to attack rolls from the bonus Strength provided by raging. This is just a straight vertical boost to that, before you even get into the fact that +6 is simply a huge ability to break the RNG.
RatedOppose.png Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
+6 is a ridiculously high number.
RatedOppose.png Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
+6 almost makes you fall off the RNG all by itself. This is way too strong for even high-level, and is a huge boost in vertical power for any sort of barbarian.