Difference between revisions of "Talk:Copy Technique (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m |
(Added rating.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Question == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=This is pretty cool. It's kind of like Heroics, the feat. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=Pretty neat. One of the more unquantifiable unquantifiable feats out there, but it looks fun. | ||
| + | }}== Question == | ||
| − | I Copy Tech Martial Study. Must I take the same maneuver? Logically one might assume yes; clarification would be cool. -- [[User:Jota | + | I Copy Tech Martial Study. Must I take the same maneuver? Logically one might assume yes; clarification would be cool. -- [[User:Jota|Jota]] 21:39, June 20, 2010 (UTC) |
: Nope, any maneuver, since you're just getting the feat, not a specific maneuver. So you could qualify for any maneuver as long as you have the IL for it, since the maneuver prereqs can be thought to be other feats, and thus one doesn't need to qualify for them. So having someone with Martial Study of MoPM 1 can give everyone else with Copy Technique high-level maneuvers as long as they have the IL for em. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 22:26, June 20, 2010 (UTC) | : Nope, any maneuver, since you're just getting the feat, not a specific maneuver. So you could qualify for any maneuver as long as you have the IL for it, since the maneuver prereqs can be thought to be other feats, and thus one doesn't need to qualify for them. So having someone with Martial Study of MoPM 1 can give everyone else with Copy Technique high-level maneuvers as long as they have the IL for em. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 22:26, June 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Delicious. -- [[User:Jota | + | ::Delicious. -- [[User:Jota|Jota]] 00:06, June 21, 2010 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ::: Yep. That said, you can't copy it from someone unless they actually take it as a feat, since it copies feats and not class abilities. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 00:08, June 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Virtual Feat? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If I'm remembering Sword and Fist correctly, that's not what a virtual feat is. I'm fairly certain that virtual feats ''can'' be used for prereqs, but the things you qualify for with it only function when the virtual feat does. --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] 20:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I'm redefining it here :-D | ||
| + | : (Though that was a 3.0 supplement anyway.) --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 01:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:46, 12 September 2013
Ratings[edit]
|
Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| This is pretty cool. It's kind of like Heroics, the feat. |
|
|
Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Pretty neat. One of the more unquantifiable unquantifiable feats out there, but it looks fun. |
Question
I Copy Tech Martial Study. Must I take the same maneuver? Logically one might assume yes; clarification would be cool. -- Jota 21:39, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, any maneuver, since you're just getting the feat, not a specific maneuver. So you could qualify for any maneuver as long as you have the IL for it, since the maneuver prereqs can be thought to be other feats, and thus one doesn't need to qualify for them. So having someone with Martial Study of MoPM 1 can give everyone else with Copy Technique high-level maneuvers as long as they have the IL for em. --Ghostwheel 22:26, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Delicious. -- Jota 00:06, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Yep. That said, you can't copy it from someone unless they actually take it as a feat, since it copies feats and not class abilities. --Ghostwheel 00:08, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
Virtual Feat?[edit]
If I'm remembering Sword and Fist correctly, that's not what a virtual feat is. I'm fairly certain that virtual feats can be used for prereqs, but the things you qualify for with it only function when the virtual feat does. --DanielDraco 20:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm redefining it here :-D
- (Though that was a 3.0 supplement anyway.) --Ghostwheel 01:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
