Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dungeonomicon (3.5e Sourcebook)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (→Favor: new section) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{RC:Leziad Favor|Very much awesome, all the way. It simply full of good stuff, from marvellous classes to fluff actually fun to read. This article clearly deserve my favor!}} | {{RC:Leziad Favor|Very much awesome, all the way. It simply full of good stuff, from marvellous classes to fluff actually fun to read. This article clearly deserve my favor!}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Favor == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gud stuff is gud. 'Nuff said. | ||
Revision as of 08:13, 30 September 2009
Contents
-omicon Names?
Why are some of the chapters titled by topic instead of by the -omicon names on the Table of Contents here? I like the -omicon names, and this new way isn't even consistent. --IGTN 02:13, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Was just going by the Table of Contents in the original work. If it's disliked, I'll change it back. For the sake of consistency, it should probably be changed back. Surgo 02:18, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh. That makes sense. Charactonomicon gets bumped up since Base Classes and Prestige Classes were originally split over two posts, and Lexiconinomicon replaced Language in D&D because the Lexiconinomicon's first subheading is Language in D&D. --IGTN 02:37, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
FAVORED!
Favored! A wonderful supplement, the Dungeonomicom, more than any other book, makes me want to play D&D. Not just any RPG - D&D specifically. New rules fixes, lovely fluff... there's really not much more I can say here. I hope the rest of the RC will back me up on this one, and we can quickly promote this to be both a gold star and our first favored article. Karrius 07:22, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
Favored
Favor
Gud stuff is gud. 'Nuff said.
