Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dungeonomicon (3.5e Sourcebook)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "{{Rating" to "{{Rating|OldRating=True")
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
|reason=Lots of good stuff in this sourcebook; I don't necessarily agree with everything, but the sheer amount of great material is definitely a must-read for anyone interested in taking a deeper look behind the design philosophies of D&D.}}
 
|reason=Lots of good stuff in this sourcebook; I don't necessarily agree with everything, but the sheer amount of great material is definitely a must-read for anyone interested in taking a deeper look behind the design philosophies of D&D.}}
  
{{Rating|OldRating=True|rater=Tarkisflux |rating=like
+
{{Rating |rater=Tarkisflux |rating=love
|reason=There's a lot in this sourcebook. Revised or new base classes with interesting abilities and prestige classes with humor and flavor that matches their abilities. Revised rules that work extremely well in the areas they are intended to, and thought provoking explanations and justifications for the way things work in DnD land. Even if you disagree with some of the author's premises and wouldn't let any of the crunchy bits within a mile of your game, there's plenty here to entertain you, challenge your assumptions, and maybe even expand the horizons of your games.}}
+
|reason=There's a lot in this sourcebook. Revised or new base classes with interesting abilities and prestige classes with humor and flavor that matches their abilities. Revised rules that work extremely well in the areas they are intended to, and thought provoking explanations and justifications for the way things work in DnD land. Even if you disagree with some of the author's premises and wouldn't let any of the crunchy bits within a mile of your game, there's plenty here to entertain you, challenge your assumptions, and maybe even expand the horizons of your games. This is easily my favorite of the F&K sourcebooks.}}
  
 
{{RC Favor|rater=Rithaniel
 
{{RC Favor|rater=Rithaniel

Revision as of 16:55, 15 July 2012

-omicon Names?

Why are some of the chapters titled by topic instead of by the -omicon names on the Table of Contents here? I like the -omicon names, and this new way isn't even consistent. --IGTN 02:13, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

Was just going by the Table of Contents in the original work. If it's disliked, I'll change it back. For the sake of consistency, it should probably be changed back. Surgo 02:18, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
Ahh. That makes sense. Charactonomicon gets bumped up since Base Classes and Prestige Classes were originally split over two posts, and Lexiconinomicon replaced Language in D&D because the Lexiconinomicon's first subheading is Language in D&D. --IGTN 02:37, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

Rating

Template:RC Favor

Template:RC Favor

RatedFavor.png Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
There's a lot in this sourcebook. Revised or new base classes with interesting abilities and prestige classes with humor and flavor that matches their abilities. Revised rules that work extremely well in the areas they are intended to, and thought provoking explanations and justifications for the way things work in DnD land. Even if you disagree with some of the author's premises and wouldn't let any of the crunchy bits within a mile of your game, there's plenty here to entertain you, challenge your assumptions, and maybe even expand the horizons of your games. This is easily my favorite of the F&K sourcebooks.


Template:RC Favor

Template:RC Favor

Template:RC Favor

Template:RC Favor

Template:RC Favor