Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dungeonomicon (3.5e Sourcebook)"
m (formatting a bit) |
(→Favor) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|reason=This is really fantastic with lots of different insights and perspectives that you would never really get unless you actually sat down and philosophized about the nature of the D&D universe for a while. To have all these musings compiled in something such as this is just wonderful. All in all, this makes for an awesome, thought-provoking read. The nature of Tome material is such that not everyone will be willing to use much of the mechanical content, but the musings are something everyone can benefit from, even if some may find the esoteric nature of the writing style off-putting}} | |reason=This is really fantastic with lots of different insights and perspectives that you would never really get unless you actually sat down and philosophized about the nature of the D&D universe for a while. To have all these musings compiled in something such as this is just wonderful. All in all, this makes for an awesome, thought-provoking read. The nature of Tome material is such that not everyone will be willing to use much of the mechanical content, but the musings are something everyone can benefit from, even if some may find the esoteric nature of the writing style off-putting}} | ||
{{RC Favor|rater=Leziad |points=2 |reason=Very much awesome, all the way. It simply full of good stuff, from marvellous classes to fluff actually fun to read. This article clearly deserve my favor!}} | {{RC Favor|rater=Leziad |points=2 |reason=Very much awesome, all the way. It simply full of good stuff, from marvellous classes to fluff actually fun to read. This article clearly deserve my favor!}} | ||
| + | {{RC Favor | ||
| + | |rater=Ganteka Future | ||
| + | |points=2 | ||
| + | |reason=Reading about a game is rarely as entertaining or worthwhile as playing the game itself. However, the enjoyable text presented here offers enough thought mulling content and intriguing information that it's really a recommended read. If ever your game gets cancelled, and you haven't read this yet. Sit down and do so. As player or DM, it will make you look forward to when you ''do'' get to play again. Invigorating | ||
| + | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 9 December 2009
-omicon Names?
Why are some of the chapters titled by topic instead of by the -omicon names on the Table of Contents here? I like the -omicon names, and this new way isn't even consistent. --IGTN 02:13, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Was just going by the Table of Contents in the original work. If it's disliked, I'll change it back. For the sake of consistency, it should probably be changed back. Surgo 02:18, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh. That makes sense. Charactonomicon gets bumped up since Base Classes and Prestige Classes were originally split over two posts, and Lexiconinomicon replaced Language in D&D because the Lexiconinomicon's first subheading is Language in D&D. --IGTN 02:37, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
Favor
Karrius
Favored! A wonderful supplement, the Dungeonomicom, more than any other book, makes me want to play D&D. Not just any RPG - D&D specifically. New rules fixes, lovely fluff... there's really not much more I can say here. I hope the rest of the RC will back me up on this one, and we can quickly promote this to be both a gold star and our first favored article. Karrius 07:22, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
Ghostwheel
Gud stuff is gud. 'Nuff said. -- Ghostwheel
Favor
Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor
