Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dungeonomicon (3.5e Sourcebook)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (modernized rating, assumed point value from commentary) |
m (spacing) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|points=2 | |points=2 | ||
|reason=Favored! A wonderful supplement, the Dungeonomicom, more than any other book, makes me want to play D&D. Not just any RPG - D&D specifically. New rules fixes, lovely fluff... there's really not much more I can say here. I hope the rest of the RC will back me up on this one, and we can quickly promote this to be both a gold star and our first favored article.}} | |reason=Favored! A wonderful supplement, the Dungeonomicom, more than any other book, makes me want to play D&D. Not just any RPG - D&D specifically. New rules fixes, lovely fluff... there's really not much more I can say here. I hope the rest of the RC will back me up on this one, and we can quickly promote this to be both a gold star and our first favored article.}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{RC Favor|rater=Ghostwheel | {{RC Favor|rater=Ghostwheel | ||
|points=1 | |points=1 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
|reason=Reading about a game is rarely as entertaining or worthwhile as playing the game itself. However, the enjoyable text presented here offers enough thought mulling content and intriguing information that it's really a recommended read. If ever your game gets cancelled, and you haven't read this yet. Sit down and do so. As player or DM, it will make you look forward to when you ''do'' get to play again. Invigorating | |reason=Reading about a game is rarely as entertaining or worthwhile as playing the game itself. However, the enjoyable text presented here offers enough thought mulling content and intriguing information that it's really a recommended read. If ever your game gets cancelled, and you haven't read this yet. Sit down and do so. As player or DM, it will make you look forward to when you ''do'' get to play again. Invigorating | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{RC Favor | {{RC Favor | ||
|rater=Sam Kay | |rater=Sam Kay | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 12 January 2010
-omicon Names?
Why are some of the chapters titled by topic instead of by the -omicon names on the Table of Contents here? I like the -omicon names, and this new way isn't even consistent. --IGTN 02:13, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Was just going by the Table of Contents in the original work. If it's disliked, I'll change it back. For the sake of consistency, it should probably be changed back. Surgo 02:18, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh. That makes sense. Charactonomicon gets bumped up since Base Classes and Prestige Classes were originally split over two posts, and Lexiconinomicon replaced Language in D&D because the Lexiconinomicon's first subheading is Language in D&D. --IGTN 02:37, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
Favor
Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor Template:RC Favor
