Difference between revisions of "Canon talk:Faction"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Good idea) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:But factions ARE part of the canon in v5, referred to ''in-game'' within the campaign guidebooks (like [[Rise of Tiamat]]). I think the term needs a disambiguation page. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 12:29, 11 December 2018 (MST) | :But factions ARE part of the canon in v5, referred to ''in-game'' within the campaign guidebooks (like [[Rise of Tiamat]]). I think the term needs a disambiguation page. [[User:Cedric|Cedric]] ([[User talk:Cedric|talk]]) 12:29, 11 December 2018 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Good to know, and a disambiguation page sounds a like good idea. You are welcome to create one if you like. I cannot do it myself, as I have no clue about the non-Planescape factions. [[User:Daranios|Daranios]] ([[User talk:Daranios|talk]]) 12:57, 12 December 2018 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 12 December 2018
This is interesting material, but what about Adventurer's League factions: Emerald Enclave, Zhentarim, etc.? Cedric (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2018 (MDT)
- Good point. I have rephrased the opening sentence so that it is even clearer that the article as it stands is Planescape-specific. Please feel free to add material about the Adventurer's League factions. (By the way, is this an in-universe term, or is it rather aimed at the players?) I would suggest to do this in a separate Canon:Adventurer's League faction article, and refer to that somewhere here. But this is of course only one possibility. Daranios (talk) 01:42, 28 October 2018 (MDT)
- But factions ARE part of the canon in v5, referred to in-game within the campaign guidebooks (like Rise of Tiamat). I think the term needs a disambiguation page. Cedric (talk) 12:29, 11 December 2018 (MST)
