Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ancestral Style (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Loophole)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Loophole ==
 
== Loophole ==
  
[s]I get the intent, but as worded you can use this on a sorcerer or another class who lacks martial/exotic and just get unarmed. Shouldn't that be in the pre-reqs?[/s] -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 00:27, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
+
<s>I get the intent, but as worded you can use this on a sorcerer or another class who lacks martial/exotic and just get unarmed. Shouldn't that be in the pre-reqs?</s> -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 00:27, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
  
 
: How does a Sorcerer get Unarmed Damage Progression? But fair. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 00:31, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
 
: How does a Sorcerer get Unarmed Damage Progression? But fair. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 00:31, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
  
 
::I appear to be a dumb who cannot into reading. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 02:07, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
 
::I appear to be a dumb who cannot into reading. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 02:07, 17 August 2017 (MDT)

Latest revision as of 08:07, 17 August 2017

Loophole[edit]

I get the intent, but as worded you can use this on a sorcerer or another class who lacks martial/exotic and just get unarmed. Shouldn't that be in the pre-reqs? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:27, 17 August 2017 (MDT)

How does a Sorcerer get Unarmed Damage Progression? But fair. --Leziad (talk) 00:31, 17 August 2017 (MDT)
I appear to be a dumb who cannot into reading. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 02:07, 17 August 2017 (MDT)