Difference between revisions of "Talk:Art Flow User (3.5e Prestige Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
m (grouped ratings) |
(Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Leziad | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=It really bad. Eschewing all common sense to plug as many things as possible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The table itself warrant an oppose but the class goes further, so much further. It goes on for so long that I have trouble getting through it. All that for a mediocre payoff which require reading yet more material. No thanks. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Surgo | {{Rating |rater=Surgo | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 30 April 2019
Ratings
|
Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It really bad. Eschewing all common sense to plug as many things as possible.
The table itself warrant an oppose but the class goes further, so much further. It goes on for so long that I have trouble getting through it. All that for a mediocre payoff which require reading yet more material. No thanks. |
|
|
Surgo opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Mediocre class that goes on for way too long and only exists to give other classes invocations. |
|
|
Franken Kesey opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Having different progressions based on what your previous class was is just a bad idea. Plus significant amount of read links and unnecessarily complicated features. |
