It really bad. Eschewing all common sense to plug as many things as possible.
The table itself warrant an oppose but the class goes further, so much further. It goes on for so long that I have trouble getting through it. All that for a mediocre payoff which require reading yet more material. No thanks.
Mediocre class that goes on for way too long and only exists to give other classes invocations.
Franken Kesey opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
Having different progressions based on what your previous class was is just a bad idea. Plus significant amount of read links and unnecessarily complicated features.
The red links are because I haven't fully developed the supporting material, and the different progressions are based on the progressions of the different possible entryway classes. --Luigifan18 (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
