Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blight (3.5e Condition)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (removing empty rating)
(Added rating.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Jota
 +
|rating=favor
 +
|reason=This is pretty cool. I think as a self-contained rule set it works pretty well and is internally consistent. I especially like the examples, both because they are of some interest themselves and because they segue into the possibility of creating further unique blights to fit any particular campaign.
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Luigifan18
 
{{Rating |rater=Luigifan18
 
|rating=favor
 
|rating=favor
 
|reason=I love the concept of this - like [[SRD:Disease|disease]], but much, '''''much''''' worse. Kudos for such a versatile condition, and it's a real shame that [[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] and [[User:Luigifan18|myself]] are the only ones who've done anything with it.
 
|reason=I love the concept of this - like [[SRD:Disease|disease]], but much, '''''much''''' worse. Kudos for such a versatile condition, and it's a real shame that [[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] and [[User:Luigifan18|myself]] are the only ones who've done anything with it.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:15, 3 March 2015

Ratings[edit]

RatedFavor.png Jota favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
This is pretty cool. I think as a self-contained rule set it works pretty well and is internally consistent. I especially like the examples, both because they are of some interest themselves and because they segue into the possibility of creating further unique blights to fit any particular campaign.
RatedFavor.png Luigifan18 favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
I love the concept of this - like disease, but much, much worse. Kudos for such a versatile condition, and it's a real shame that Sulacu and myself are the only ones who've done anything with it.
FavoredJota + and Luigifan18 +