Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boxer (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(→Monk's technical non-proficiency aside...) |
TK-Squared (talk | contribs) m (→Monk's technical non-proficiency aside...) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Also this is already the case. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 18:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | Also this is already the case. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 18:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : > Isn't this redundant? | ||
+ | |||
+ | : No. You are not guaranteed proficiency in your unarmed strikes, and Improved Unarmed Strike does not require proficiency. But also, redundancy is built into feat pre-reqs in general; for example, [[SRD:Greater_Weapon_Specialization|Greater Weapon Specialization]] has a requirement of Weapon Focus, while Weapon Specialization already has that. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : With regards to the 3HD, I'm going to be spitballing on some things because I'm a bit out of touch with 3.5e. But, you cannot enchant your fists, as the rules are written. 3HD should probably say that your fists are *Masterwork* and enchantable. But, the last bit is about two-weapon fighting, I think, which will allow you to add half your damage bonus to the second attack, unlike if it were a light weapon. I think, I can't be sure. --[[User:TK-Squared|TK-Squared]] ([[User talk:TK-Squared|talk]]) 06:10, 8 August 2019 (MDT) |
Revision as of 12:10, 8 August 2019
Monk's technical non-proficiency aside...
"Improved Unarmed Strike, Proficient with Unarmed Strikes."
Isn't this redundant? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
"3 HD: You can enchant your unarmed strike as though it was a normal weapon. It is also treated as a one-handed weapon, instead of a light weapon, when it is advantageous to do so."
Also this is already the case. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- > Isn't this redundant?
- No. You are not guaranteed proficiency in your unarmed strikes, and Improved Unarmed Strike does not require proficiency. But also, redundancy is built into feat pre-reqs in general; for example, Greater Weapon Specialization has a requirement of Weapon Focus, while Weapon Specialization already has that.
- With regards to the 3HD, I'm going to be spitballing on some things because I'm a bit out of touch with 3.5e. But, you cannot enchant your fists, as the rules are written. 3HD should probably say that your fists are *Masterwork* and enchantable. But, the last bit is about two-weapon fighting, I think, which will allow you to add half your damage bonus to the second attack, unlike if it were a light weapon. I think, I can't be sure. --TK-Squared (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2019 (MDT)