Talk:Boxer (3.5e Feat)

Monk's technical non-proficiency aside...

"Improved Unarmed Strike, Proficient with Unarmed Strikes."

Isn't this redundant? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

"3 HD: You can enchant your unarmed strike as though it was a normal weapon. It is also treated as a one-handed weapon, instead of a light weapon, when it is advantageous to do so."

Also this is already the case. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

> Isn't this redundant?

No. You are not guaranteed proficiency in your unarmed strikes, and Improved Unarmed Strike does not require proficiency. But also, redundancy is built into feat pre-reqs in general; for example, Greater Weapon Specialization has a requirement of Weapon Focus, while Weapon Specialization already has that.

With regards to the 3HD, I'm going to be spitballing on some things because I'm a bit out of touch with 3.5e. But, you cannot enchant your fists, as the rules are written. 3HD should probably say that your fists are *Masterwork* and enchantable. But, the last bit is about two-weapon fighting, I think, which will allow you to add half your damage bonus to the second attack, unlike if it were a light weapon. I think, I can't be sure. --TK-Squared (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2019 (MDT)