Difference between revisions of "Talk:Broken Shields (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) m |
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Shields and Spells == | == Shields and Spells == | ||
| − | Should shields be able to block all spells? (Of course, mean the ones that allow a saving throw...) --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 23:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC) | + | Should shields be able to block all spells? (Of course, mean the ones that allow a saving throw... Though I may need to create exceptions for those that create a persistent area. Don't want to just up and negate like... walls of flame or blade barriers, etc.) --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 23:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:24, 2 May 2014
Ratings
|
Havvy likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Shields offer active defense instead of passive defense which should make the fight look more realistic where everybody sees that shields are being used instead of treated like an accessory.
This is also a huge defensive buff for meleers should they sacrifice a large amount of offensive damage or get an animated shield. More meaningful choices is good. |
Shields and Spells
Should shields be able to block all spells? (Of course, mean the ones that allow a saving throw... Though I may need to create exceptions for those that create a persistent area. Don't want to just up and negate like... walls of flame or blade barriers, etc.) --Ghostwheel (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
