Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heat Wave (3.5e Invocation)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== About the changes == FYI, there's no real functional difference between blur at will and blur persisted. Blur lasts for minutes and there are really no combat situations ...")
 
(About the changes)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
FYI, there's no real functional difference between blur at will and blur persisted.  Blur lasts for minutes and there are really no combat situations which last more than a minute where spending a standard action to re-apply matters. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 
FYI, there's no real functional difference between blur at will and blur persisted.  Blur lasts for minutes and there are really no combat situations which last more than a minute where spending a standard action to re-apply matters. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 19:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
Ok I can see how it would be no different than the other 24hr duration invocations that this one. At the time there was an eyebrow raise from my DM. Again I am sorry about the non-clarity edits. It won't happen again. I'm going to go and undo the edit on this one. -- [[User:Gr7mm Bobb|Gr7mm Bobb]] ([[User talk: Gr7mm Bobb|talk]]) 08:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:55, 8 August 2014

About the changes[edit]

FYI, there's no real functional difference between blur at will and blur persisted. Blur lasts for minutes and there are really no combat situations which last more than a minute where spending a standard action to re-apply matters. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Ok I can see how it would be no different than the other 24hr duration invocations that this one. At the time there was an eyebrow raise from my DM. Again I am sorry about the non-clarity edits. It won't happen again. I'm going to go and undo the edit on this one. -- Gr7mm Bobb (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)