Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monastic Adept (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=I like things that scale scaling features (such as IL, CL, etc) without granting new features. I find that fair and just. That... and it's monk. Its the archetypal weak class. No complaints here. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | {{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 23 March 2014
Ratings
|
Eiji-kun likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I like things that scale scaling features (such as IL, CL, etc) without granting new features. I find that fair and just. That... and it's monk. Its the archetypal weak class. No complaints here. |
|
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I'm strongly against feats that make taking more levels in a class worthless without any real downsides. Also the argument, "But WotC did it first," doesn't fly--just because they did bad design sometimes doesn't mean we need to copy them. |
