Difference between revisions of "Talk:Safety Goggles (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
(updated rating) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
{{Rating |rater=Ganteka Future | {{Rating |rater=Ganteka Future | ||
− | |rating= | + | |rating=neutral |
− | |reason=Serious about safety indeed. This is a pretty potent cantrip here. Minimize damage on alchemical things. It comes closest to ''damp power'' (a 2nd level psionic power), as far as I can tell, durations and casting time differences aside. Short version though: a cantrip negates several builds and that's not kosher. Alchemical items cost money, and if used against a player, its just going to make them angry. | + | |reason=<s>Serious about safety indeed. This is a pretty potent cantrip here. Minimize damage on alchemical things. It comes closest to ''damp power'' (a 2nd level psionic power), as far as I can tell, durations and casting time differences aside. Short version though: a cantrip negates several builds and that's not kosher. Alchemical items cost money, and if used against a player, its just going to make them angry.</s><br /> |
+ | The rework makes this much more viable as a cantrip in 3.5e. I wouldn't really recommend it (but it should probably be okay) for use with Pathfinder at-will cantrips though, given its hour long duration and party-wide application, since these things vary from "common" to "never" depending on the adventure or campaign. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 18:46, 31 January 2020
Ratings[edit]
Ganteka Future is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. | |
---|---|
The rework makes this much more viable as a cantrip in 3.5e. I wouldn't really recommend it (but it should probably be okay) for use with Pathfinder at-will cantrips though, given its hour long duration and party-wide application, since these things vary from "common" to "never" depending on the adventure or campaign. |