Difference between revisions of "Talk:Swift Spell (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) m (Ghostwheel moved page Talk:Swiften Spell (3.5e Feat) to Talk:Swift Spell (3.5e Feat) without leaving a redirect) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What are the consequences of allowing this feat? I don't know! --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 12:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC) | What are the consequences of allowing this feat? I don't know! --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 12:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Reposting a summary of what I said in chat for the sake of others. Negative adjustment is generally a bad idea. I have seen it, rarely, but as a rule its probably a thing to avoid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :As for the effect itself (if you put it at an adjustment of +0), there is precedence for this buuuut it makes me wary. For example: Expeditious Retreat (minutes) and Swift Expeditious Retreat (swift, 1 round). That's fine. I am certain there is something there is something that breaks allowing it on just any spell, but off hand admittedly I can't think of it, so it might work. As someone brought up: Swift Dominate Person may be a game changer for hitting to do just the wrong thing at the right time, but again this does actually seem to be something you'd be doing at this level. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :My recommendation: Make it +0. That solves the more troubling part. Keep it unquant. -- 13:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:54, 20 February 2020
What are the consequences of allowing this feat? I don't know! --Ghostwheel (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- Reposting a summary of what I said in chat for the sake of others. Negative adjustment is generally a bad idea. I have seen it, rarely, but as a rule its probably a thing to avoid.
- As for the effect itself (if you put it at an adjustment of +0), there is precedence for this buuuut it makes me wary. For example: Expeditious Retreat (minutes) and Swift Expeditious Retreat (swift, 1 round). That's fine. I am certain there is something there is something that breaks allowing it on just any spell, but off hand admittedly I can't think of it, so it might work. As someone brought up: Swift Dominate Person may be a game changer for hitting to do just the wrong thing at the right time, but again this does actually seem to be something you'd be doing at this level.
- My recommendation: Make it +0. That solves the more troubling part. Keep it unquant. -- 13:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
