Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tower Shield(5e Armor)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Added rating.) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun | ||
| + | |rating=oppose | ||
| + | |reason=Finish the task. Incomplete you be. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | {{Rating |rater=Ghostwheel | ||
|rating=oppose | |rating=oppose | ||
| Line 9: | Line 13: | ||
|reason=Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a '''Very Rare''' item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. | |reason=Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a '''Very Rare''' item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | Reduced AC granted by the tower shield | + | Reduced AC granted by the tower shield [[User:XX the memenist Xx|XX the memenist Xx]] ([[User talk:XX the memenist Xx|talk]]) 21:37, 16 March 2019 (MDT) |
| + | |||
| + | == Unfinished work is unfinished == | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2019, it's not gonna be finished will it? -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 06:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Two more similar reviews and we can relegate it to a sandbox ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 09:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:03, 12 May 2023
Ratings[edit]
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Finish the task. Incomplete you be. |
|
|
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| With the RNG the way it is, +4 AC is too much, especially with how easy it is to get shield proficiency on characters who do not attack using their own attack rolls or other casters. |
|
|
TK-Squared opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a Very Rare item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. |
Reduced AC granted by the tower shield XX the memenist Xx (talk) 21:37, 16 March 2019 (MDT)
Unfinished work is unfinished[edit]
2019, it's not gonna be finished will it? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Two more similar reviews and we can relegate it to a sandbox ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Ghostwheel (talk) 09:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
