Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tower Shield(5e Armor)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|reason=Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a '''Very Rare''' item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. | |reason=Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a '''Very Rare''' item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | Reduced AC granted by the tower shield | + | Reduced AC granted by the tower shield [[User:XX the memenist Xx|XX the memenist Xx]] ([[User talk:XX the memenist Xx|talk]]) 21:37, 16 March 2019 (MDT) |
Revision as of 03:37, 17 March 2019
Ratings
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
With the RNG the way it is, +4 AC is too much, especially with how easy it is to get shield proficiency on characters who do not attack using their own attack rolls or other casters. |
TK-Squared opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. | |
---|---|
Bounded Accuracy - the way that accuracy works in D&D5e - is definitely not compatible with a +4 bonus to AC - that's on top of armour calculations, of course. A Shield that grants +4 to AC is a Very Rare item after all. Then, we can also mention that D&D 5e is not all that compatible with just doling out penalties - like a -2 penalty to attack - in the majority of its workings. It just increases unnecessary complexity. |
Reduced AC granted by the tower shield XX the memenist Xx (talk) 21:37, 16 March 2019 (MDT)