User talk:Gr7mm Bobb

New Guy Learning New Things

Just figured I should finally put up some form of talk page just to get it out the way for now.

Article Granularity

I've split off the Warforged Tactician into it's own article (since we have separate articles for subraces), and included it back in the original article with the magic of transclusion - the "{{:PAGENAME}}" stuff. It's probably better to split those off into their own articles and then include them back in the page in that way. It makes the subraces more obvious on the nav page, makes it easier to use them in other places (if that ever matters), and makes it easier for you to add subraces created by others for the warforged to the article. If you want to I mean.

If that sounds like a problem or if you have any issues setting it up, let me know :-) - Tarkisflux ^Talk 20:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Alright I have finished with the subtypes as i had planned out. So if you are willing to move the subtypes around into their proper spots, that would be phenomenal. As you can probably tell I am pretty fresh to this whole process. Anyway I'll be checking back every once in a while.Gr7mm Bobb (talk) 22:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

I can do another, but it would be helpful if you could do at least 1 yourself. That way you can let me know if anything about the preload is confusing or weird, which I can't see at all these days. You start them the same way you do the races - the link to the new subrace is even on the same page as the new race one.

Oh, here's a link to the one I moved, so you can see what I did with it: Warforged Tactician (5e Subrace). - Tarkisflux ^Talk 04:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Sweet thank you, I went ahead and used the tools provided. I definitely appreciate the help. The only thing that I would really like now is to get the race rated. I understand that WoTC released their version of Warforged in their Ebberon UA, I just really don't like it (that and the artificer). - Gr7mm Bobb (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Glad things were working and clear. I'm not sufficiently comfortable with the edition to rate 5e material, but I didn't see anything outside the bounds of sanity when I was helping get it into format. I don't think we have a lot of 5e regulars here yet, so it might be a bit before real criticism gets to it. You're welcome to link to your work on other sites though, if you want to speed the process along. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 03:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Secondary voice! I am/was trying to learn 5e as well, but I am not yet competent and my 5e game has faltered due to DM health issues, so it may be a while more. One day... one day I will join you on the 5e mountain. And then double my content via conversions, ruling all of Wiki Mountain ahahahhahahahahahahahahaha!

I mean... what Tark said, I'm not yet knowledgeable enough yet to judge 5e content yet. If it helps, consider the Minmax Boards. While 5e isn't very widespread over there either, they already know about this site via me so they might be able to help. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Lizardfolk 5e

I had a question about the Lizardfolk 5e article. I posted it on that article's discussion page. If you could answer it, I would appreciate it. --Rlyehable (talk) 04:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Pyrclastic Bloodline

Commented on Talk:Sorcerous Origin - Pyroclastic Bloodline (5e Subclass) --Rlyehable (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your Other Homebrew

Would you mind if I copied your works from giantitp here? I feel if we had more 5e content that that might invite other 5e brewers to the site and really help populate the otherwise barren 5e home brew section - Aeturo (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2017 (MDT)

Super late on this repy, and totally my b, But yeah thats chill for me. I actually have most of my brew in a group lead google drive. If needed, i can post some of the links to the specific docs of things that I've made or modified.--Gr7mm Bobb (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2017 (MST)

Don't mean to pick on you, but I'm going to pick on you.

As an avid 5e gamer I'm looking to put in reviews on a lot of the more complete 5th edition homebrew content. Before I start barraging your works with more reviews (some potentially, where we disagree on design principles), I just wanted to give you a heads-up. Vaegrim (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2017 (MST)

Thanks for the heads up bud. Looking forward to it, anxiously, but still looking forward to it. A LOT of my homebrew on this site is severely out of date and/or touch. So I completely expect it. --Gr7mm Bobb (talk) 13:39, 7 December 2017 (MST)