User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage (3.5e Feat)

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
< User talk:Luigifan18
Revision as of 03:55, 17 May 2019 by Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) (Luigifan18 moved page User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage to User talk:Luigifan18/Deadeye Rage (3.5e Feat) without leaving a redirect: Where did the tag go?)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Ratings[edit]

RatedOppose.png Surgo opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
+6 is just, what?

Honestly, the feat would work fine on its own if you just removed the attack roll bonus entirely.

RatedOppose.png Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
Am I reading the same feat HB is reading? I don't see anything about ranged attacks in here, I see a massive attack bonus. Which is weird, because barbarians need attack bonuses the least: they are the ones with full BAB, high strength, and even higher strength when they rage. They are "I Hit You: The Class". Why are you giving them bonuses to hit?

The attack wand thing is nice. Though ironically nothing about this feat removes the need for UMD, on the barbarian who won't have it as his class skill and probably tanked charisma. So... suboptimal there, and strangely broken otherwise.

RatedOppose.png HB Forged opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
Upon closer inspection... no ranged items? I'd say avoid it (as opposed to invade it).
RatedDislike.png Zhenra-Khal dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
Echoing everybody else's rating, +6 is too much. It would be different if it scaled (Like +1 per 3 or 4 levels in a Rage-granting class), but you can literally take this at 1st level and get a free +6 to hit. Other than the large bonus, I don't dislike the feat at all. It's just... Broken, in that one bit.
RatedOppose.png Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
The name sounded cool, but it just a ridiculous number boost.
RatedDislike.png ThunderGod Cid dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
I have to agree with UK and GW here, especially given that the Barbarian already has a bonus to attack rolls from the bonus Strength provided by raging. This is just a straight vertical boost to that, before you even get into the fact that +6 is simply a huge ability to break the RNG.
RatedOppose.png Undead Knave opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
+6 is a ridiculously high number.
RatedOppose.png Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
+6 almost makes you fall off the RNG all by itself. This is way too strong for even high-level, and is a huge boost in vertical power for any sort of barbarian.
RatedNeutral.png Franken Kesey is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
Like the ability to do things like use magic wands when raging. However the +6 to attack is bad. Remove the attack bonus and will revise rating.