User talk:Saber/Kubikiribocho (3.5e Equipment)

Ratings

	Ghostwheel dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	Should be an artifact.

	Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	Wat. ... Wat? I'm going to imagine a Kubikiribocho is some kind of butt tumor you slap people with.

ThunderGod Cid opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.

Even if this were simply a weapon that was really big, dealt 3d6 base damage at Medium size, and had an 18-20 critical threat range, I would still probably oppose it simply on the grounds that it pretty much outdoes any other weapon ever. Tack on the fact that nothing actually describes what the weapon is (the text vaguely suggests that it is something like an organism based on the hp), the article is incomplete (there is no mention of proficiency level or whether the weapon is one or two handed; the only thing revealed about its size is that it weighs 30 pounds), and it gives absolutely silly HD-based bonuses with zero justification (I'll give all of these to zombies or bloodhulks to abuse their high HD totals at low CR) and I definitely give it an Oppose.

	Havvy opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	What Cid said. This flies in the face of balance.

Misplaced

It does not look like you meant this to be a basic weapon -- you meant it to be an artifact. Would this be correct? --DanielDraco (talk) 02:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes this was supposed to be an artifact when I clicked add your own artifact it gave me a list of options and I assumed those were types of artifacts. Earlier failing to scroll down the page as I wanted to add an artifact weapon. I now realize there's a specific artifact equipment format lower down on the page... Is there an easy fix to change the format so it fits into the artifact category?--70.77.192.8 02:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)scalper

Not really. Easiest way is to make a new page from scratch. I can delete this one for you when you're done copying from it. --DanielDraco (talk) 02:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)