Difference between revisions of "User talk:Viatos/Hollow Nymph (3.5e Martial Discipline)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Who is this available to? == First off - great work, I really like it! Secondly - which martial adepts are these maneuvers available to? You never make this clear. - ~~~~")
 
(Who is this available to?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
First off - great work, I really like it! Secondly - which martial adepts are these maneuvers available to? You never make this clear. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 08:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 
First off - great work, I really like it! Secondly - which martial adepts are these maneuvers available to? You never make this clear. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 08:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 +
:Thank you. By flavor, probably Swordsages (and my Hexblade Variant) but I am all for loose or nonexistent restrictions on available Disciplines. This is one of a number of Disciplines that fit an internal thematic better then they fit the standard martial classes (see also: Tiger Claw). - [[User:Viatos|Viatos]] 08:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:36, 3 March 2011

Who is this available to?[edit]

First off - great work, I really like it! Secondly - which martial adepts are these maneuvers available to? You never make this clear. - MisterSinister 08:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. By flavor, probably Swordsages (and my Hexblade Variant) but I am all for loose or nonexistent restrictions on available Disciplines. This is one of a number of Disciplines that fit an internal thematic better then they fit the standard martial classes (see also: Tiger Claw). - Viatos 08:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)