Talk:Bone (3.5e Equipment)

Ratings

	Leziad dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
	What foxwarrior said.

	Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	It's pointlessly good, but that's not the worst part by far. All it gives, really, is extra hp and hardness, but those stats are totally nonsensical for this item.

Magic Bone?

I think it's supposed to be some kind of augmented magical bone, as normal bone isn't THAT great of a building material (its why it's usually the purvue of primitive society). Hardness 6 and I don't remember what hp, if I recall. Speaking of hardness...

...not sure what the hardness is. Wood objects have +1 hardness (6), metal -1 (9?), but it's hardness is also 5? I am confused. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 03:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

SRD:Breaking_and_Entering is your friend. And yes, this means that Bone is almost identical to iron when used to make wooden objects. When used to make iron objects, it is weaker. When used to make objects that are neither metal nor wooden, it's barely stronger than wood. --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

That don't make sense yo. Shiggity diggity dang dwag in da hawse. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

The sole purpose of this equipment is to make weapons and armor that is normally metallic, non-metallic. Anything else on this page is just flourishing. Yes, bone is far inferior to all metal – yet superior to a wooden sword. Where is the mid-ground? --Franken Kesey (talk) 04:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

My accusation is that the numbers don't make sense, given what we know of bone. Why isn't it hardness 6? Why does the hardness change if you've made it in the shape of a sword or a club? -- Eiji-kun (talk) 05:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)