Ratings[edit]
|
Leziad opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
|
| It not even formatted right, it also suck. Others said it more eloquently.
|
|
|
Eiji-kun opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
|
| Oh yeah, another "quality" Timplate work. It's pretty off kilter for reasons others brought up.
|
|
|
Fluffykittens opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
|
| What Ganetka said.
|
|
|
Ganteka Future opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
|
| This template is a mess to read/sift through to figure out what might be balanced and what might not be. At that, even the different elementals aren't balanced to each other (so, a PC party of just different elemental avatars wouldn't even work). Grants abilities that aren't level appropriate but is otherwise mostly uninteresting and bland. Doesn't even explicitly say "you only get get one of the following elemental types" or something to that effect which is a silly oversight, like messing up the year in the Author Box. DMs and players should steer clear of this, even for monsters, because it is a mess (though monsters is about the only thing, with tinkering, that I could even say "hey, if you want to put the work in and fudge it yourself, go ahead"). Sandbox and rework this, or get some assistance.
|
Sorry IP/Rollback[edit]
Sorry IP, but I had to rollback your changes. We have a policy that if you're going to make mechanical changes (which you're doing) you need to be the author, or try to ask the author first. Also, your changes be cray cray yo. Anyway, that's why I did it. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
