Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forever Forgotten (3.5e Epic Spell)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ratings)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|reason=No death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect? Insanity not well explained? Needs to be clarified more before it should be published IMO.
 
|reason=No death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect? Insanity not well explained? Needs to be clarified more before it should be published IMO.
 
}}
 
}}
:The reason no death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect are that [A] those effects are too weak in comparison (A higher level spell with a similar function may be effective.) and [B] it was a willing tribute paid only by those who would determine that to be a willing sacrifice.  As for being not well explained, is the issue that I did not include a chart detailing the % rolls upon which each effect takes place?  That is easily fixed, though I thought it to be well-described.
+
:The reason no death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect are that [A] those effects are too weak in comparison (A higher level spell with a similar function may be effective.) and [B] it was a willing tribute paid only by those who would determine that to be a willing sacrifice.  As for being not well explained, is the issue that I did not include a chart detailing the % rolls upon which each effect takes place?  That is easily fixed, though I thought it to be well-described. [[User:Maninorange|Maninorange]] ([[User talk:Maninorange|talk]]) 19:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:29, 11 July 2013

Ratings

RatedOppose.png Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
No death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect? Insanity not well explained? Needs to be clarified more before it should be published IMO.
The reason no death/miracle/wish can reverse the effect are that [A] those effects are too weak in comparison (A higher level spell with a similar function may be effective.) and [B] it was a willing tribute paid only by those who would determine that to be a willing sacrifice. As for being not well explained, is the issue that I did not include a chart detailing the % rolls upon which each effect takes place? That is easily fixed, though I thought it to be well-described. Maninorange (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)