Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blitzkrieg (3.5e Maneuver)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott |rating=neutral |reason=This certainly isn't a bad maneuver, it is just a bit boring. It doesn't break away from the Amaranth Eclipse theme, but it also isn't strongly part of the discipline either. I'm not even saying you should change it: this is just one of my randomed daily ratings ;).}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott |rating=neutral |reason=This certainly isn't a bad maneuver, it is just a bit boring. It doesn't break away from the Amaranth Eclipse theme, but it also isn't strongly part of the discipline either. I'm not even saying you should change it: this is just one of my randomed daily ratings ;).}}
  
:Pretty identical to the steel wind maneuver, if you ask me. --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] ([[User talk:Sulacu|talk]]) 20:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
+
:Pretty similar to the steel wind maneuver, if you ask me. The only difference being both attacks can target the same creature. --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] ([[User talk:Sulacu|talk]]) 20:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:01, 13 July 2014

Ratings

RatedNeutral.png Aarnott is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
This certainly isn't a bad maneuver, it is just a bit boring. It doesn't break away from the Amaranth Eclipse theme, but it also isn't strongly part of the discipline either. I'm not even saying you should change it: this is just one of my randomed daily ratings ;).


Pretty similar to the steel wind maneuver, if you ask me. The only difference being both attacks can target the same creature. --Sulacu (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)