Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luigifan18:Viewtiful Monarch (3.5e Prestige Class)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(That Progression)
(That Progression: It's all a coincidence, I swear.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:Beholder mage I've heard of (yeeesh), but what's an ur-priest? --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 04:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:Beholder mage I've heard of (yeeesh), but what's an ur-priest? --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 04:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::Complete Divine/Book of Vile Darkness Cleric Atheist with essentially this progression, but you can get into it easily at level 6. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 
::Complete Divine/Book of Vile Darkness Cleric Atheist with essentially this progression, but you can get into it easily at level 6. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::I honestly had no idea that any other classes had this progression. I came up with it off the top of my head, thinking "hmm, this is basically a wizard with caster level issues, but full spellcasting progression, a decent base attack bonus, and a bunch of special abilities... I'll give it fewer spell slots to balance it out." --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 04:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:36, 4 December 2012

That Progression

Ur-Priest and that Beholder thing use this progression, and are among the cheesiest cheese around because of it. The BAB requirement at least can't be worked around (I think), which fixes the larger half of the problem, but I can't help but suspect that the progression is still bad for other more insidious reasons. --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Beholder mage I've heard of (yeeesh), but what's an ur-priest? --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Complete Divine/Book of Vile Darkness Cleric Atheist with essentially this progression, but you can get into it easily at level 6. --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I honestly had no idea that any other classes had this progression. I came up with it off the top of my head, thinking "hmm, this is basically a wizard with caster level issues, but full spellcasting progression, a decent base attack bonus, and a bunch of special abilities... I'll give it fewer spell slots to balance it out." --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)