Difference between revisions of "User talk:Luigifan18:Viewtiful Monarch (3.5e Prestige Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→That Progression: new section) |
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) (→That Progression) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Ur-Priest and that Beholder thing use this progression, and are among the cheesiest cheese around because of it. The BAB requirement at least can't be worked around (I think), which fixes the larger half of the problem, but I can't help but suspect that the progression is still bad for other more insidious reasons. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC) | Ur-Priest and that Beholder thing use this progression, and are among the cheesiest cheese around because of it. The BAB requirement at least can't be worked around (I think), which fixes the larger half of the problem, but I can't help but suspect that the progression is still bad for other more insidious reasons. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 04:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Beholder mage I've heard of (yeeesh), but what's an ur-priest? --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 04:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:30, 4 December 2012
That Progression
Ur-Priest and that Beholder thing use this progression, and are among the cheesiest cheese around because of it. The BAB requirement at least can't be worked around (I think), which fixes the larger half of the problem, but I can't help but suspect that the progression is still bad for other more insidious reasons. --Foxwarrior (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Beholder mage I've heard of (yeeesh), but what's an ur-priest? --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
