Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prepared Spontaneous Casting (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) m (Ghostwheel moved page Talk:No Prepared Casting (3.5e Variant Rule) to Talk:Prepared Spontaneous Casting (3.5e Variant Rule) without leaving a redirect) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (→Comments) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Rereading it, it's definitely not what I'm looking for. I don't see a whole party getting Haste all day long for free, even at level 20. How does this screw over sorcerers, and how badly? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 18:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | :: Rereading it, it's definitely not what I'm looking for. I don't see a whole party getting Haste all day long for free, even at level 20. How does this screw over sorcerers, and how badly? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 18:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Well, sorcerers were already inferior to wizards in essentially every way other than spontaneous casting. Okay, looking back at the actual tables, your variant gives the sorcerer slightly more spells known total than the wizard, so I might have been exaggerating a little, but the wizard's spells known at their highest spell levels (the important levels) compete just fine with the sorcerer's, and the wizard is still better about spell levels and feats. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 18:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:57, 8 October 2013
Comments
Fishing for thoughts. Does this break the game? Is it a decent change? Does it screw sorcerers over? Is it playable? And for the love of all the gods, can anyone think of a better name? --Ghostwheel (talk) 17:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- No. Mana-Based Spellcasting contains this one, and is cooler. Completely. Yes. Prepared Spontaneous Casting? --Foxwarrior (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Rereading it, it's definitely not what I'm looking for. I don't see a whole party getting Haste all day long for free, even at level 20. How does this screw over sorcerers, and how badly? --Ghostwheel (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Well, sorcerers were already inferior to wizards in essentially every way other than spontaneous casting. Okay, looking back at the actual tables, your variant gives the sorcerer slightly more spells known total than the wizard, so I might have been exaggerating a little, but the wizard's spells known at their highest spell levels (the important levels) compete just fine with the sorcerer's, and the wizard is still better about spell levels and feats. --Foxwarrior (talk) 18:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
