Difference between revisions of "Talk:Extra Level (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
This should be unquantifiable rather than VH; compare the benefits of taking this for monk as opposed to tome fighter. With such a difference, this shouldn't be in a specific balance range. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 23:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC) | This should be unquantifiable rather than VH; compare the benefits of taking this for monk as opposed to tome fighter. With such a difference, this shouldn't be in a specific balance range. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 23:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :While it would probably not break a monk-level game to get monk class features a level early, it'd still be an obnoxious feat design in that case. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 23:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, 11 June 2024
Ratings[edit]
|
Foxwarrior opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Ironically this would be almost acceptable in a Moderate or Low balance game.
But for Very High, just no, do not. |
|
|
ErikOfWiki opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Kill it with fire! There is nothing to even salvage here. |
This should be unquantifiable rather than VH; compare the benefits of taking this for monk as opposed to tome fighter. With such a difference, this shouldn't be in a specific balance range. --Ghostwheel (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- While it would probably not break a monk-level game to get monk class features a level early, it'd still be an obnoxious feat design in that case. --Foxwarrior (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
