Difference between revisions of "Talk:Consu (3.5e Race)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with "== Ratings == {{Rating |rater=Aarnott |rating=neither |reason=The flavor is great. Comparing to a half-giant (LA +1), this seems to fall short by a bit. I think Half-giants fall...") |
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott |rating=neither |reason=The flavor is great. Comparing to a half-giant (LA +1), this seems to fall short by a bit. I think Half-giants fall short by a bit too! Maybe I'm undervaluing reach, but there just doesn't seem to be much uniqueness going for this race besides that it is a smart tough guy.}} | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott |rating=neither |reason=The flavor is great. Comparing to a half-giant (LA +1), this seems to fall short by a bit. I think Half-giants fall short by a bit too! Maybe I'm undervaluing reach, but there just doesn't seem to be much uniqueness going for this race besides that it is a smart tough guy.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I'd say you're very much undervaluing reach; this race is really good as-is with everything it gets for +1 LA. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] 21:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:40, 1 August 2011
Ratings
|
Aarnott is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| The flavor is great. Comparing to a half-giant (LA +1), this seems to fall short by a bit. I think Half-giants fall short by a bit too! Maybe I'm undervaluing reach, but there just doesn't seem to be much uniqueness going for this race besides that it is a smart tough guy. |
- I'd say you're very much undervaluing reach; this race is really good as-is with everything it gets for +1 LA. --Ghostwheel 21:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
