Changes

To say that we each find the other abhorrent, a babble mouth, stupid, or a jackass would be a gross anomaly. We admittedly have some detest with the the other. Yet, I still find your comments to be helpful, and non-condensing at times. And even with your problems (I definitely have some to), I have great respect for your ideas. Who could forget your work on the Viveka SpectreGhost! So out of respect, I request your advice and rating of the following: [[Sith/ Jedi Force Conduit (3.5e Class)]], [[Viveka Spectre Ghost (3.5e Prestige Class)]], and [[Uongo-mijusi (3.5e Race)]]. I, in part, would dislike if this conflict should wane - but thanks. Your bain bane --[[User:Franken Kesey|Franken Kesey]] 02:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC) (the madman)

== Rating notice 5e Race Template (Alignment Without Alignmentreply) == I replied to your comments at [[User_talk:Rlyehable#5e_Race_Template]] == Amberite Planescape ==

{{RatingNoticeYour username ''[[Wikipedia:Merlin_of_Amber#Ghostwheel| Alignment Without Alignment Ghostwheel]]'' brings a question to mind: Did you ever run or play a game that combined [[Canon:Planescape|Planescape]] with elements of [[Wikipedia:Amber_Diceless_Roleplaying_Game|Amber]]? --- [[User:Thanateros|Thanateros]] ([[User talk:Thanateros|talk]]) 08:14, 27 January 2019 (3.5e Variant RuleMST)‎}}

[[User:Ideasmith|Ideasmith]] ([[User talk:Ideasmith|talk]]) 14:47Yep, 25 June 2017 (MDT)This is that's where the first time I’ve attempted to block ratings. It looks name's from, and nope, have not done anything like I got it rightthat.--[[User:IdeasmithGhostwheel|IdeasmithGhostwheel]] ([[User talk:IdeasmithGhostwheel|talk]]) 1409:4728, 25 June 2017 27 January 2019 (MDTMST)

== Blocked Rating Block Notice =={{RatingNotice|Force Conduit (3.5e Class)‎}} --Franken Kesey 20:05, 25 March 2019 (MDT)

:{{BlockNoticeRatingNotice|Saiyan Warrior Ghost (3.5e Prestige Class)}}--Franken Kesey 11:16, 30 March 2019 (MDT)

:::{{BlockNoticeRatingNotice|WarforgedHalf-Gr7mm_Lucerna (5e_Race3.5e Template)|Warforged‎}}

:::The [[Half-Lucerna (3.5e Template)]] has been changed since your rating in a way that makes your rating reason nonsensical. I thought you should be made aware. --[[User:Qwertyu63|Qwertyu63]] ([[User talk:Qwertyu63|talk]]) 22:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC) ::::{{RatingNotice|Morality Test (3.5e Spell)}} ::::[[Morality Test (3.5e Spell)|Morality Test]] has a save now, and I can't remember how I convinced myself it didn't need one originally. Your rating doesn't explicitly reference a save, but I'm reasonably confident that the arguments put forth rest on the old version's ridiculous power as a SoD without save. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 06:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC) {{ri}} {{BlockNotice|Half-Nymph_(3.5e_Racial_Paragon_Class)}} {{BlockNotice|Ascended_Super_Saiyan_(3.5e_Feat)}} If you could take a minute to go back and take a fresh look at these pages, I'd appreciate it! Thanks in advance!! [[User:The-Marksman|The-Marksman]] ([[User talk:The-Marksman|talk]]) 14:55, 11 March 2019 (MDT) :{{BlockNotice|Saiyan Warrior (3.5e Class)}} ::{{RatingNotice| Alignment Without Alignment (3.5e Variant Rule)‎}} ::[[User:Ideasmith|Ideasmith]] ([[User talk:Ideasmith|talk]]) 14:47, 25 June 2017 (MDT)::This is the first time I’ve attempted to block ratings. It looks like I got it right.[[User:Ideasmith|Ideasmith]] ([[User talk:Ideasmith|talk]]) 14:47, 25 June 2017 (MDT) ::{{BlockNotice|Warforged-Gr7mm_(5e_Race)|Warforged}}--[[User:Gr7mm Bobb|Gr7mm Bobb]] ([[User talk:Gr7mm Bobb|talk]]) 13:02, 19 April 2019 (MDT) :::{{BlockNotice|Spread Ray (3.5e Feat)}} :::I altered [[Spread Ray (3.5e Feat)]], come have a look. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 20:39, 5 August 2018 (MDT) ::::{{BlockNotice|Spider-Monk (3.5e Class)}}  ::::The rating in question has been blocked. Just letting you know. --[[User:Nolanf|Nolanf]] ([[User talk:Nolanf|talk]]) 22:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC) {{ri}} {{BlockNotice|Biological Reconstruction (3.5e Power)}}--Franken Kesey 17:59, 16 April 2019 (MDT) :{{BlockNotice|Alchemist (5e Subclass)}} :I turned it into a subclass. Sure it still has issues, but this should have solved 80% of the problems.--Franken Kesey 17:39, 19 April 2019 (MDT) ::{{BlockNotice|Transmute Magic (5e Spell)}}--Franken Kesey 09:20, 23 April 2019 (MDT) :::{{BlockNotice|Transmute Magnetics (5e Spell)}}--Franken Kesey 09:36, 23 April 2019 (MDT) ::::{{BlockNotice|Transmute Neg/Pos Energy (5e Spell)}}--Franken Kesey 12:10, 25 April 2019 (MDT) {{ri}} {{BlockNotice|DPR (3.5e Guide)}}--Franken Kesey 12:04, 8 May 2019 (MDT) :{{BlockNotice|Frankenstein's Monster (3.5e Power)}} ::{{BlockNotice|Hothead (3.5e Feat)}} :::{{BlockNotice|Greater Hothead (3.5e Feat)}} ::::{{BlockNotice|Dag (3.5e Race)}} :::::Your rating of [[Biological Reconstruction (3.5e Power)]] no longer refers to the current power. Please rerate.--Franken Kesey 18:16, 1 July 2019 (MDT) {{BlockNotice|Bola (5e Weapon)}}:I have reworked the article. I have removed the {{srd5lc|Light Weapon}} and {{srd5lc|Versatile}} properties. I have changed the automatic {{srd5lc|Grapple}} on a hit to a Dex saving throw to avoid the effect. I have kept the target size of {{SRD5|Large}} or smaller because traditionally bolas have been used on cattle (which are large creatures). --[[User:Rlyehable|Rlyehable]] ([[User talk:Rlyehable|talk]]) 09:15, 13 August 2019 (MDT)::{{BlockNotice|Bola (5e Weapon)}}::Added net's verbiage restricting to only 1 attack. --[[User:Rlyehable|Rlyehable]] ([[User talk:Rlyehable|talk]]) 09:36, 13 August 2019 (MDT) PS. Thank you for your constructive criticism. ==Rating/Review Request= = Requesting your rating or review of the [[Judge of Existence (3.5e Race Class)]], [[Wildknife (3.5e Class)]] and [[Force Conduit (3.5e Class)]]. Thank you.--Franken Kesey 07:13, 13 April 2019 (MDT) :Could really use your criticism on the above articles. The more detailed the better.--Franken Kesey 13:16, 22 April 2019 (MDT) ::Bump.--Franken Kesey 08:57, 24 April 2019 (MDT) :::Could you rate the [[Force Conduit (3.5e Class)]] and [[Judge of Existence (3.5e Class)]].--Franken Kesey 11:30, 4 May 2019 (MDT) ::::You misread the apex, the only alignment restriction is it cannot be lawful (but can be neutral), this aligns with a barbarian which has the same restriction.--Franken Kesey 16:01, 5 May 2019 (MDT) ::::: No... No, I'm pretty sure I got it right based on what they are required to do. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 16:07, 5 May 2019 (MDT) {{ri}} Reread it, it makes no mention of good or evil. It does not even say chaos required. Only non-lawful.--Franken Kesey 17:15, 5 May 2019 (MDT) : No, yeah, it's still there. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 19:48, 5 May 2019 (MDT) ::Where are you perceiving that it states chaotic evil is a requirement? What line?--Franken Kesey 19:50, 5 May 2019 (MDT) :::Made something new called [[Recall Past Life (3.5e Power)]] fell free to criticize. --Franken Kesey 08:44, 12 May 2019 (MDT) ==New Users== Many new users do not create accounts before creating articles. This is normal, and ok. However, some are completly unfamiluar with formating and editing on this wiki. When regular users, like yourself, attempt to help them they are unaware because most do not check their own talk page. Some of the fixes are easy to solve, the issue is how to alert and communicate with them. What are your thoughts on having a template posted on the main article of users who are new and outside regular communication? Something like a winter cleaning template, but instead, directing them to wiki formating 101 and their own talk page.--Franken Kesey 12:49, 25 April 2019 (MDT) : Create one and we'll see how it looks? --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 13:26, 25 April 2019 (MDT) ::Created one called [[Template :Formatting 101]]. What are your thoughts?--Franken Kesey 14:15, 25 April 2019 (replyMDT)  ==Dungeon Demon== Do you ever positively rate anything? Keep finding articles with your ratings, and almost all are negative. Does that cloud of negativity affect anything else in your life? :Negativity is a wonderful thing in creative fields. Lots of people are too cowardly to give negative feedback for fear of the grumpy responses they might get, so creators who make things nobody wants don't realize it and keep going along, wasting their time on bad things instead of improving until their (homebrew pages, games, paintings, whatever) are actually good. I applaud Ghostwheel for his dedication and have been spending the past few years working on complaining more myself. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 12:55, 12 May 2019 (MDT) ::Literally everyone knows this is you, Kesey. Do this shit again and I'll ban you. I'm now in the process of blocking all Tor exits. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] ([[User talk:Surgo|talk]]) 15:45, 12 May 2019 (MDT):::Side note, I enjoy it to a certain extent when the wiki regulars even swing by my content, and even find it interesting enough to suggest changes and balance consideration. I may not have their clout, but I appreciate the efforts.--[[User:Gr7mm Bobb|Gr7mm Bobb]] ([[User talk:Gr7mm Bobb|talk]]) 12:31, 14 May 2019 (MDT)

Your username ''== Dervish ==Thank you for your comments. I have moved the class out of the main namespace to my [[WikipediaUser:Merlin_of_Amber#GhostwheelRlyehable/sandbox/2|Ghostwheelsandbox]]'' brings a question for continued development. I have again revised it and would appreciate any comments you would be willing to mind: Did make. Again, thank you ever run or play a game that combined [[Canon:Planescape|Planescape]] with elements of [[Wikipedia:Amber_Diceless_Roleplaying_Game|Amber]]? -. -- [[User:ThanaterosRlyehable|ThanaterosRlyehable]] ([[User talk:ThanaterosRlyehable|talk]]) 0809:1400, 27 January 9 July 2019 (MSTMDT)

{{BlockNotice|HalfNew type of Martial weapon, ranged weapon2 lb. 2d6 piercing -Nymph_ammunition (3150/600 ft.), heavy, two-handedThis unique weapon can be used only by a Medium or larger creature that has a Strength of 18 or higher.5e_Racial_Paragon_ClassThe bow shoots oversized arrows that deal piercing damage equal to (2d6 + the wielder's Strength modifier)}}.

If Ammunition. You can use a weapon that has the ammunition property to make a ranged attack only if you have ammunition to fire from the weapon. Each time you attack with the weapon, you expend one piece of ammunition. Drawing the ammunition from a quiver, case, or other container is part of the attack. Loading a one-handed weapon requires a free hand. At the end of the battle, you could take can recover half your expended ammunition by taking a minute to go back and take search the battlefield.If you use a fresh look at weapon that pagehas the ammunition property to make a melee attack, I'd appreciate it! Thanks you treat the weapon as an improvised weapon. A sling must be loaded to deal any damage when used in advance!! [[User:The-Marksman|The-Marksman]] ([[User talk:The-Marksman|talk]]) 14:55, 11 March 2019 (MDT)this way.

:{{RatingNotice|Force Conduit (3Heavy.5e Class)‎}} Creatures that are Small or Tiny have disadvantage on attack rolls with heavy weapons. A heavy weapon's size and bulk make it too large for a Small or Tiny creature to use effectively.Two--Franken Kesey 20:05Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use. This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, 25 March 2019 (MDT)not when you simply hold it.

Source::{{RatingNotice|Ghost (3.5e Prestige Class)}}--Franken Kesey 11:16WDH, 30 March 2019 (MDT)page 201