Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liber Demonica (3.5e Sourcebook)/LD3"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Thrall to Demon/Servant of the Obryith== Wouldn't feats such as Venom of Obox-ob make more sense to use Servant of the Obryith rather than Thrall to Demon, since well Obox-ob i...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Thrall to Demon/Servant of the Obryith==
 
==Thrall to Demon/Servant of the Obryith==
 
Wouldn't feats such as Venom of Obox-ob make more sense to use Servant of the Obryith rather than Thrall to Demon, since well Obox-ob is an obryith, I only mean this for these type of feats that are given by obryith, not ones such as Graz'zt's Shadows.--[[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 06:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 
Wouldn't feats such as Venom of Obox-ob make more sense to use Servant of the Obryith rather than Thrall to Demon, since well Obox-ob is an obryith, I only mean this for these type of feats that are given by obryith, not ones such as Graz'zt's Shadows.--[[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 06:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
:This is actually a valid point. Not sure what Cid thinks on the subject, but if he's not against it I'll definitely make that improvement. - [[User:MisterSinister|MisterSinister]] 09:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Yay I made a valid point :D (been a while since that happened).--[[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 13:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:27, 14 February 2011

Thrall to Demon/Servant of the Obryith[edit]

Wouldn't feats such as Venom of Obox-ob make more sense to use Servant of the Obryith rather than Thrall to Demon, since well Obox-ob is an obryith, I only mean this for these type of feats that are given by obryith, not ones such as Graz'zt's Shadows.--Stryker 06:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

This is actually a valid point. Not sure what Cid thinks on the subject, but if he's not against it I'll definitely make that improvement. - MisterSinister 09:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Yay I made a valid point :D (been a while since that happened).--Stryker 13:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)