Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magician (3.5e Class)"
Paleomancer (talk | contribs) (→Balance Level) |
(→I love this: new section) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thanks for the correction. I've been looking at it now, and I agree that it deserves a higher rating.--[[User:Paleomancer|Paleomancer]] 17:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | Thanks for the correction. I've been looking at it now, and I agree that it deserves a higher rating.--[[User:Paleomancer|Paleomancer]] 17:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == I love this == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I just want to tell you how great this feat is. It really alows for some flavor. Every sorrcer should take this. Free mage hand isn't to powerfull but is really fun to play arround with. Same with prestigation. With this feat you become more than a glorified commoner who can cast spells, you have an aura of magic around you.--[[User:Parakee|Parakee]]<sup>[[User Talk:Parakee|Talk]]</sup> 16:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:06, 28 June 2011
Balance Level
I know the class features aren't filled in at the moment, but judging from the summary ("an arcane spellcaster that combines the spell versatility of wizards and the spontanaeity of sorcerers") I willing to gamble and say right off the bat that this is not fighter-level. If anything, since this is getting the best of both worlds (from two already wizard-level classes, no less), this is almost definitely wizard-level if it is actually anything similar to the wizard or sorcerer. - TG Cid 19:36, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction. I've been looking at it now, and I agree that it deserves a higher rating.--Paleomancer 17:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
I love this
I just want to tell you how great this feat is. It really alows for some flavor. Every sorrcer should take this. Free mage hand isn't to powerfull but is really fun to play arround with. Same with prestigation. With this feat you become more than a glorified commoner who can cast spells, you have an aura of magic around you.--ParakeeTalk 16:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)