Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gentleman Explorer (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Foxwarrior (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
(Added rating.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Ratings == | == Ratings == | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Aarnott | ||
| + | |rating=love | ||
| + | |reason=Fantastic! The class has a humorous read, but is very well balanced and looks like it would be fun to play. There are plenty of fluff features that flesh out the class. Great work! | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | {{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior | ||
|rating=like | |rating=like | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 20 August 2012
Ratings
|
Aarnott favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Fantastic! The class has a humorous read, but is very well balanced and looks like it would be fun to play. There are plenty of fluff features that flesh out the class. Great work! |
|
Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| It's a very entertaining read backing a solid and unusual combat class. |
|
|
Jay Freedman favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Fun to read and fun to explore. So few classes can offer such dedicated components, entertaining abilities, tested details, and straight-forward results amid a torrent of 'tea-induced' literary bamboozle'ments. |
|
|
Ghostwheel favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| Very flavorful, good damage, I like this article very much. |
|
|
Eiji-kun favors this article and rated it 4 of 4! |
|---|---|
| The flavor! The mechanics! The flavor! Mmmm mmm!!! The flavor really does sell this, and I want to play one (and you inspire me to other things). Let's make this a favored article! |
