Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ranged Threat (3.5e Feat)"

Revision as of 05:45, 17 August 2013

	Tarkisflux favors this article and rated it 4 of 4!
	The new format makes it stand out while providing a substantial ranged benefit. It was ok before, but now its both good and interesting.

	Foxwarrior likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
	Now this actually resembles how it should work, even. The range limit being so short is a little bit strange.

Blocked Rating	Surgo is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
Blocked Rating	This rating refers to a substantially different version of the article, or concerns mentioned in it have already been addressed.This is not a bad base at all. The issue I have is that movement provokes AoOs, and that can get a bit nuts. Even Tome Point Blank Shot specifically disallows AoOs on movement.

I remember discovering, to my dismay, that each movement action only provokes one AoO. --Foxwarrior (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |rating=neutral
 |reason=This is not a bad base at all. The issue I have is that movement provokes AoOs, and that can get a bit nuts. Even Tome Point Blank Shot specifically disallows AoOs on movement.
+|block=NewVersion
 }}
 I remember discovering, to my dismay, that each movement ''action'' only provokes one AoO. --[[User:Foxwarrior|Foxwarrior]] ([[User talk:Foxwarrior|talk]]) 07:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)