Difference between revisions of "Talk:Insightful Strike (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) |
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Comment) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Ridiculously overpowered for a single feat with absolutely no prerequisite. --173.179.31.155 | Ridiculously overpowered for a single feat with absolutely no prerequisite. --173.179.31.155 | ||
| − | :It's certainly a lot stronger than your standard feats, true, but I wouldn't call it ridiculously overpowered. It's also up in the DMM balance range for feats, so it's got a lot to compete with. You may be interested in seeing the thought process behind this and every other scaling feat on the wiki (well, maybe not the archetype ones, not sure of their genesis). [[Races_of_War_(3.5e_Sourcebook)/Warriors_with_Style#The_Failure_of_Feats| | + | :It's certainly a lot stronger than your standard feats, true, but I wouldn't call it ridiculously overpowered. It's also up in the DMM balance range for feats, so it's got a lot to compete with. You may be interested in seeing the thought process behind this and every other scaling feat on the wiki (well, maybe not the archetype ones, not sure of their genesis). [[Races_of_War_(3.5e_Sourcebook)/Warriors_with_Style#The_Failure_of_Feats|Here's an essay and more scaling feats]]. - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 01:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:57, 23 September 2013
Comment
Ridiculously overpowered for a single feat with absolutely no prerequisite. --173.179.31.155
- It's certainly a lot stronger than your standard feats, true, but I wouldn't call it ridiculously overpowered. It's also up in the DMM balance range for feats, so it's got a lot to compete with. You may be interested in seeing the thought process behind this and every other scaling feat on the wiki (well, maybe not the archetype ones, not sure of their genesis). Here's an essay and more scaling feats. - Tarkisflux Talk 01:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
