Difference between revisions of "Talk:Agent (3.5e Class)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (Created page with '== Favor == Very nice work--the specializations allow the agent to fulfill many different roles, allowing them to become true jacks-of-all-trades. Very good work! --~~~~') |
m |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | == Ratings == |
| + | {{Rating |rater=ThunderGod Cid | ||
| + | |rating=neutral | ||
| + | |reason=While I think what's here is fine, I would like to see a few less blank levels. Levels 8 and 13-14 in particular seem quite a let down that would dissuade me from wanting to play this especially in relation to other High-level options. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Rating |rater=Somehownotsingle | ||
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=A good chassis with the ability to customize in many different ways. I like it! | ||
| + | }} | ||
| − | Very nice work--the specializations allow the agent to fulfill many different roles, allowing them to become true jacks-of-all-trades. Very good work! --[[User: | + | {{Rating|rater=Ghostwheel |
| + | |rating=like | ||
| + | |reason=Very nice work--the specializations allow the agent to fulfill many different roles, allowing them to become true jacks-of-all-trades. Very good work!}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note on this class; the agent is almost 7 years old today, and is one of the first homebrew classes and the first articles that I have written for D&D. I would say it is not quite up to snuff with the current level of quality that I expect from my own articles. I intend to rewrite this class when the inspiration hits me, filling out the specializations and - among other things, get rid of the dead levels. I am welcoming of suggestions to that end. --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] ([[User talk:Sulacu|talk]]) 08:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:00, 15 May 2014
Ratings[edit]
|
ThunderGod Cid is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| While I think what's here is fine, I would like to see a few less blank levels. Levels 8 and 13-14 in particular seem quite a let down that would dissuade me from wanting to play this especially in relation to other High-level options. |
|
Somehownotsingle likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| A good chassis with the ability to customize in many different ways. I like it! |
|
|
Ghostwheel likes this article and rated it 3 of 4. |
|---|---|
| Very nice work--the specializations allow the agent to fulfill many different roles, allowing them to become true jacks-of-all-trades. Very good work! |
Note on this class; the agent is almost 7 years old today, and is one of the first homebrew classes and the first articles that I have written for D&D. I would say it is not quite up to snuff with the current level of quality that I expect from my own articles. I intend to rewrite this class when the inspiration hits me, filling out the specializations and - among other things, get rid of the dead levels. I am welcoming of suggestions to that end. --Sulacu (talk) 08:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
