Difference between revisions of "Talk:Metamagic Expertise (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Balance == Metamagic shenanigans should always be VH IMO, since they can lead to some pretty crazy things. --~~~~") |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Metamagic shenanigans should always be VH IMO, since they can lead to some pretty crazy things. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 06:58, 4 May 2017 (MDT) | Metamagic shenanigans should always be VH IMO, since they can lead to some pretty crazy things. --[[User:Ghostwheel|Ghostwheel]] ([[User talk:Ghostwheel|talk]]) 06:58, 4 May 2017 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I understand your concerns, but in this case I'm not so sure. Many metamagic effects themselves are VH, and so are most of the abusable spells. I don't see this feat by itself warrant a VH. --[[User:Sulacu|Sulacu]] ([[User talk:Sulacu|talk]]) 07:22, 4 May 2017 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:22, 4 May 2017
Balance
Metamagic shenanigans should always be VH IMO, since they can lead to some pretty crazy things. --Ghostwheel (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2017 (MDT)
