Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beedrill (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
(Created page with 'shouoldln't this have the vermin type? or "augmented vermin" subtype, since its still a bug and that lets it be target of bug spells like giant vermin. --~~~~') |
Quantumboost (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
shouoldln't this have the vermin type? or "augmented vermin" subtype, since its still a bug and that lets it be target of bug spells like giant vermin. --[[User:NameViolation|NameViolation]] 05:15, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | shouoldln't this have the vermin type? or "augmented vermin" subtype, since its still a bug and that lets it be target of bug spells like giant vermin. --[[User:NameViolation|NameViolation]] 05:15, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You could make a reasonable Beedrill entry which was Vermin type. This one isn't currently. Is there some particular property of it being "Vermin" you have in mind? Keeping in mind that ''giant vermin'' is actually not a valid spell on anything except a centipede, spider, or scorpion. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 05:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:47, 24 March 2010
shouoldln't this have the vermin type? or "augmented vermin" subtype, since its still a bug and that lets it be target of bug spells like giant vermin. --NameViolation 05:15, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
- You could make a reasonable Beedrill entry which was Vermin type. This one isn't currently. Is there some particular property of it being "Vermin" you have in mind? Keeping in mind that giant vermin is actually not a valid spell on anything except a centipede, spider, or scorpion. --Quantumboost 05:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
