Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beedrill (3.5e Monster)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:You could make a reasonable Beedrill entry which was Vermin type. This one isn't currently. Is there some particular property of it being "Vermin" you have in mind? Keeping in mind that ''giant vermin'' is actually not a valid spell on anything except a centipede, spider, or scorpion. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 05:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | :You could make a reasonable Beedrill entry which was Vermin type. This one isn't currently. Is there some particular property of it being "Vermin" you have in mind? Keeping in mind that ''giant vermin'' is actually not a valid spell on anything except a centipede, spider, or scorpion. --[[User:Quantumboost|Quantumboost]] 05:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Well weedle and kakuna are vermin, so i figure this should be too. but rather than recalculate a bunch of numbers and stuff, i figure add the augmented vermin subtype. Shows evolution, and adds a slight bit of fluff with the evolution. It technically wouldn't do much, but if someone has "rebuke vermin" for example, i think it should affect beedrils. OR classes that handle vermin should be able to handle one. --[[User:NameViolation|NameViolation]] 06:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC) | + | ::Well weedle and kakuna are vermin, so i figure this should be too. but rather than recalculate a bunch of numbers and stuff, i figure add the augmented vermin subtype. Shows evolution, and adds a slight bit of fluff with the evolution. It technically wouldn't do much, but if someone has "rebuke vermin" for example, i think it should affect beedrils. OR classes that handle vermin should be able to handle one. same with venomoth and butterfree. you have one and then its type changes and you cant handle one anymore. --[[User:NameViolation|NameViolation]] 06:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:04, 24 March 2010
shouoldln't this have the vermin type? or "augmented vermin" subtype, since its still a bug and that lets it be target of bug spells like giant vermin. --NameViolation 05:15, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
- You could make a reasonable Beedrill entry which was Vermin type. This one isn't currently. Is there some particular property of it being "Vermin" you have in mind? Keeping in mind that giant vermin is actually not a valid spell on anything except a centipede, spider, or scorpion. --Quantumboost 05:47, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Well weedle and kakuna are vermin, so i figure this should be too. but rather than recalculate a bunch of numbers and stuff, i figure add the augmented vermin subtype. Shows evolution, and adds a slight bit of fluff with the evolution. It technically wouldn't do much, but if someone has "rebuke vermin" for example, i think it should affect beedrils. OR classes that handle vermin should be able to handle one. same with venomoth and butterfree. you have one and then its type changes and you cant handle one anymore. --NameViolation 06:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
