Difference between revisions of "Talk:Better Counterspelling (3.5e Variant Rule)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Tarkisflux (talk | contribs) (→Dispel Action: new section) |
(→Dispel Action) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Does dispel use an AoO and an immediate action, or just the immediate? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 22:37, July 16, 2010 (UTC) | Does dispel use an AoO and an immediate action, or just the immediate? - [[User:Tarkisflux|TarkisFlux]] 22:37, July 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Just immediate. [[User:Surgo|Surgo]] 01:24, July 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 17 July 2010
Playtesting Note
Ghostwheel had the following idea in chat:
<Ghostwheel> Could be *noddish* Perhaps make it a CL check, both sides getting a bonus equal to 2x the spell level spent? <Ghostwheel> That way duskblades can be decent too, even with lower-level spells
I think right now that's making it too hard for the attacker as they already have to draw line of effect through them in the first place and hit the spell with the attack of opportunity, but it might be an appropriate idea. That's something whose answer will come out in playtesting. Surgo 16:19, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Decent? That's +20+10 vs. +20+18 we're talking about as a baseline case. If it was plus one time the spell level, it could work.
- Either way works, but without that doubling you'll notice that the only difference between a sixth-level spell being countered by a first-level spell is only +5 against being countered. I personally don't think you should be able to counter a sixth-level spell with a first-level spell, period, especially with how wide the RNG is on opposed checks (1-20 rather than 1-10 when using set DCs). --Ghostwheel 20:27, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Dispel Action
Does dispel use an AoO and an immediate action, or just the immediate? - TarkisFlux 22:37, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Just immediate. Surgo 01:24, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
