Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faerie Glow (3.5e Spell)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
DanielDraco (talk | contribs) (Wait, I missed something there.) |
DanielDraco (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Rating |rater=DanielDraco | {{Rating |rater=DanielDraco | ||
|rating=neutral | |rating=neutral | ||
| − | |reason=I was about to give this a 3/4, but then I realized that it's touch range. So it has a low save, a low range, and suffers the miss chance it seeks to negate. Orisons shouldn't be very strong, but they also shouldn't be gimped quite ''that'' much. | + | |reason=I was about to give this a 3/4, but then I realized that it's touch range. So it has a low save, a low range, and suffers the miss chance it seeks to negate. Orisons shouldn't be very strong, but they also shouldn't be gimped quite ''that'' much. I think it would be better if it were targeted and ranged -- that way, it offers a save, affects only one foe, and cannot be used against foes with total concealment, which is probably about enough of a gimp to drop it to being an orison without being useless. |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 10 September 2012
Ratings
|
DanielDraco is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I was about to give this a 3/4, but then I realized that it's touch range. So it has a low save, a low range, and suffers the miss chance it seeks to negate. Orisons shouldn't be very strong, but they also shouldn't be gimped quite that much. I think it would be better if it were targeted and ranged -- that way, it offers a save, affects only one foe, and cannot be used against foes with total concealment, which is probably about enough of a gimp to drop it to being an orison without being useless. |
