Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ranged Soulblade (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Oooh, I like it. == | == Oooh, I like it. == | ||
This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my [[Psyknife_(3.5e_Class)|psyknife]] class? Giving you all original credit, of course. [[User:Spanambula|Spanambula]] ([[User talk:Spanambula|talk]]) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) | This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my [[Psyknife_(3.5e_Class)|psyknife]] class? Giving you all original credit, of course. [[User:Spanambula|Spanambula]] ([[User talk:Spanambula|talk]]) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | :Go for it Spambula, it is just a variation on the soulbow prestige class and the pathfinder soulbolt package that already exist. [[User:Amdillae|Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 11:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC) | + | :Go for it Spambula, it is just a variation on the soulbow prestige class and the pathfinder soulbolt package that already exist. In fact if you go with the ACF I might see about playing a Psyknife rather than a soulblade next build I work on[[User:Amdillae|Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 11:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:49, 16 August 2016
Oooh, I like it.[edit]
This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my psyknife class? Giving you all original credit, of course. Spanambula (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)