Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ranged Soulblade (3.5e Alternate Class Feature)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Oooh, I like it. ==
 
== Oooh, I like it. ==
 
This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my [[Psyknife_(3.5e_Class)|psyknife]] class? Giving you all original credit, of course. [[User:Spanambula|Spanambula]] ([[User talk:Spanambula|talk]]) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 
This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my [[Psyknife_(3.5e_Class)|psyknife]] class? Giving you all original credit, of course. [[User:Spanambula|Spanambula]] ([[User talk:Spanambula|talk]]) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
:Go for it Spambula, it is just a variation on the soulbow prestige class and the pathfinder soulbolt package that already exist. [[User:Amdillae|Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 11:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
+
:Go for it Spambula, it is just a variation on the soulbow prestige class and the pathfinder soulbolt package that already exist. In fact if you go with the ACF I might see about playing a Psyknife rather than a soulblade next build I work on[[User:Amdillae|Amdillae]] ([[User talk:Amdillae|talk]]) 11:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:49, 16 August 2016

Oooh, I like it.[edit]

This is a great idea, ranged types deserve more options than they have. Do you mind if I adapt this to work as an ACF for my psyknife class? Giving you all original credit, of course. Spanambula (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Go for it Spambula, it is just a variation on the soulbow prestige class and the pathfinder soulbolt package that already exist. In fact if you go with the ACF I might see about playing a Psyknife rather than a soulblade next build I work onAmdillae (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)