Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monastic Adept (3.5e Feat)"
From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Ghostwheel (talk | contribs) (Added rating.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|reason=I'm strongly against feats that make taking more levels in a class worthless without any real downsides. Also the argument, "But WotC did it first," doesn't fly--just because they did bad design sometimes doesn't mean we need to copy them. | |reason=I'm strongly against feats that make taking more levels in a class worthless without any real downsides. Also the argument, "But WotC did it first," doesn't fly--just because they did bad design sometimes doesn't mean we need to copy them. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Taking more levels in monk is worthless. --[[User:Leziad|Leziad]] ([[User talk:Leziad|talk]]) 21:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:08, 23 March 2014
Ratings
|
Ghostwheel opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4. |
|---|---|
| I'm strongly against feats that make taking more levels in a class worthless without any real downsides. Also the argument, "But WotC did it first," doesn't fly--just because they did bad design sometimes doesn't mean we need to copy them. |
