Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pressure (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Foxwarrior
 +
|rating=dislike
 +
|reason=What I already said about the mooks/balance point, but more emphatically since it's been a while.
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun
 
{{Rating |rater=Eiji-kun
 
|rating=dislike
 
|rating=dislike

Revision as of 07:52, 16 April 2014

Ratings

RatedDislike.png Foxwarrior dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
What I already said about the mooks/balance point, but more emphatically since it's been a while.
RatedDislike.png Eiji-kun dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
I'm familiar with the pokemon ability. As a "use two uses/wait twice as long" thing it functions well, though it doesn't explain how it interacts with 1/day things or with, say, spellcasting. The fatigue thing is absurd, and not even the pokemon pressure does that anyway so I don't know why it's there.

Disliked only because it has functional ideas in it, but I much rather it be replaced by something better written.


Balance Point

I don't think that an army of 1st level mooks with this feat would be very easy to fight, what with the almost certain exhaustion and all. Also, at Moderate, the chance of exhausting equal-power opponents with this is quite high. --Foxwarrior (talk) 05:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

It should probably be changed to VH, as a start. Then maybe have its wording tidied up so that it's more clear that it is talking about things like SLAs and monster powers rather than class abilities. --Aarnott (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Facts about "Pressure (3.5e Feat)"
DislikedFoxwarrior + and Eiji-kun +