emailconfirmed, Administrators
1,436
edits
Changes
→10 Levels
::::::I guess my ''real'' problem is that I think it's stupid to outright ''force'' someone to multiclass. It's acceptable for a prestige class to end before level 10 (and therefore have no capacity for gaining more levels than that in the class) because if you take a prestige class, you've already made the decision to be a multiclassed character. With a base class that ends before level 20 (and therefore lacks infinite level advancement, epic-wise), a character who starts out in the class hits a brick wall upon reaching the highest level, and their next level ''has'' to be in another class. They literally have no choice but to multiclass. What if they're perfectly happy with the class they started out in?!? They shouldn't be required to take levels in a different class if they don't want to! Multiclassing carries XP penalties, you know! ...So, yeah, that's what really irks me — the fact that a character can't be allowed to continue a career that they're comfortable in. --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 15:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
:::::::I tend to agree that so-called "base" classes should proceed to the end of a character progression (be that E6, E20, unbounded, whatever). But it's a point of taste. I tend to overlook the detail if and only if there is some class to continue advancement without radically transforming what the character is and does. So, in my view, this class is fine -- you can continue it with pretty much any fighting class -- but [[http://dnd-wiki.org/wiki/Puppeteer_%283.5e_Class%29|Puppeteer]], for example, is not. --[[User:DanielDraco|DanielDraco]] ([[User talk:DanielDraco|talk]]) 20:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
